Portrait of NoorAl Sammarraie
Nooruldeen
CORRUPTION / PROTEST / EMIGRATION
CONTACT
PROJECT / 02COUNTRY-LEVEL STATISTICS · 2022

Shiftingshadows.

An exploratory study of how corruption perceptions, protest events and emigration appear together across countries.

BACK TO RESEARCH
DATA ANALYSIS / REGRESSION / INTERPRETATIONCOLLABORATIVE COURSE PROJECT · 2024
01 / THE STUDYCOUNTRY COMPARISONS · EXPLORATORY MODELS

CORRUPTION · PROTEST · EMIGRATION

When people can speak, or leave, what patterns appear in the data?

2022 INDICATORS · FINAL SAMPLE VARIES BY ANALYSIS

Shifting Shadows brings together the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), recorded protest events and emigration totals. The report describes an initial 50-country dataset, while some later analyses use a final sample of 35 countries. It uses descriptive statistics, confidence intervals, hypothesis tests, ANOVA and regression in RStudio.

Three measures, different scales

The variables are country-level aggregates, not measures of an individual’s views or migration decision. The project compares values and fits exploratory models to look for associations.

01 / CPI · 2022

Perceptions index

A public-sector corruption perceptions measure; higher scores generally indicate a cleaner public sector.

02 / PROTEST · 2022

Recorded events

Counts of protest events, as described by the project’s ACLED data source.

03 / EMIGRATION · 2020

Emigration totals

Country totals cited from Our World in Data, with a different reference year from the other measures.

04 / SAMPLE

50 → 35 countries

The written report describes an initial 50-country sample and a 35-country final sample for some analyses.

THE POWERPOINT · INSIDE THE PAGE

Browse the full presentation.

Use the blue slide controls or keyboard arrows. Each slide has a concise reading note below the presentation frame.

SHIFTING SHADOWS / COUNTRY STUDY01 / 17
Opening slide of Shifting Shadows: the interplay of corruption, protests and emigration.

01 / OVERVIEW

Shifting Shadows

A student study of corruption perceptions, protest events and emigration, using country-level indicators and statistical models.

EDIT OR PRESENT THE ORIGINAL DECKDOWNLOAD THE EDITABLE POWERPOINT

What the reported models say

The presentation reports a weak CPI-only relationship with emigration (R² around 0.10; p above .05), and a stronger simple association between protest counts and emigration totals (R² around 0.35). An ANOVA comparing protest means by subregion reports p around 0.33, so it does not find a statistically significant difference under that test.

A later multiple regression reports a higher overall fit, but the report and slides shift sample definitions and describe a mixture of predictors. The coefficient interpretation should be checked against the underlying data and script before being treated as a settled result.

Why the association is not a causal pathway

The data are observational and aggregated by country. A relationship between protest counts and emigrant totals cannot tell whether protest activity caused migration. Population size, conflict, labour markets, geography and other unmeasured differences could affect both.

The source slide uses CPI as a perception index, protest events from 2022, and emigration totals from 2020. Different years and raw totals reduce direct comparability.